News from ICLMG

Urgent repatriation of Canadians detained in northeast Syria only rights-compliant response: legal community to PM Trudeau

Federal government must respect Federal Court ruling and repatriate all Canadians detained in northeast Syria, says Canada’s legal community

Today, an unprecedented open letter was sent to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau by more than 110 members of Canada’s legal community, calling on his government to honor the recent Federal Court ruling ordering the repatriation of Canadians arbitrarily detained in northeast Syria and work to urgently bring them back to Canada, consistent with the country’s domestic and international law obligations.

The full letter is below, and available as PDF here.

On January 20, 2023, the Federal Court of Canada ordered four of the detained Canadian men returned under section 6(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees Canadian citizens the right to enter Canada. Instead of honoring this decision, though, the federal government is appealing it, and, in doing so, making the troubling argument that by upholding basic rights, the courts are somehow interfering in government affairs. 

The letter is being released as the Federal Court of Appeals hears arguments today in the government’s appeal of the initial ruling. The letter is in support of an op-ed published today in the Globe and Mail.

Signatories include:
  • Former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Allan Rock
  • Human rights advocates Alex Neve, Sharry Aiken, Faisal Kutty, Yavar Hameed, Azeezah Kanji, Paul Champ, Carmen Cheung Ka-Man and Nicole Filion
  • International law experts François Crépeau, Obiora Okafor, Michael Byers and John Packer
  • Experts in national security and criminal law Kent Roach and Faisal Bhabha
  • Natasha Bakht, Jasminka Kalajdzic, Robert Currie, Ardi Imseis and numerous other law professors from across the country
  • Representatives of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association, the Arab Canadian Lawyers Association, the National Association of Women and the Law, the Canadian Council of Muslim Women, the BC Civil Liberties Association and the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights, among many others.

TAKE ACTION

“The only course of action to address these grave human rights concerns and show that Canada takes its human rights obligations seriously is to repatriate these men as soon as possible. At a time when universal principles such as the right to a fair trial and prohibitions on arbitrary detention, torture and ill treatment are increasingly undermined around the world, this is an opportunity for Canada to lead by example.”

– Allan Rock, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

“The courts have recognized that the right of Canadian citizens to return to Canada is fundamental and foundational. Rights without effective remedies are less than useless. Further delay may make effective remedies impossible and the government should respect the court’s findings and repatriate these Canadian citizens.”

– Kent Roach, Professor of Law, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

“Repatriating Canadians held in life-threatening, indefinite detention in northeast Syria is an important step in addressing systemic Islamophobia. The federal government has claimed an interest in rectifying this problem. They must now act.”

– Natasha Bakht, Professor, Shirley Greenberg Chair for Women and the Legal Profession, University of Ottawa

“Over fifteen years ago, the Arar and Iacobucci Inquiries confirmed that Canadian agencies had failed Maher Arar, Ahmad Elmaati, Abdullah Almalki and Muayyed Nureddin. Canada violated its own policies and legal duties and thus contributed to the torture of these four Canadian citizens by Syrian officials. The current government’s refusal to repatriate other Muslim Canadian men is a continuation of a policy under which some individuals’ citizenship counts for less than others’. Canada must repatriate the men, as other countries have done with their own citizens, and show that it has learned from the grievous mistakes made in the so-called war on terror.”

– Jasminka Kalajdzic, Associate Professor at Windsor Law, and counsel at the Iacobucci Inquiry

“‘A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian.’ Justin Trudeau said that, in July 2015. We’re just asking for consistency.”

– Michael Byers, Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law, University of British Columbia

“As Justice Henry Brown stated in his decision, every day the Canadian government delays, it puts the lives of these Canadians in danger. The federal government’s refusal to respect the decision of the courts and to leave these Canadians under indefinite detention in overcrowded prisons and brutal detention camps is not just unacceptable and inhumane, it is a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”

– Tim McSorley, national coordinator of the ICLMG

FULL LETTER:

March 27, 2023

The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, P.C., M.P.
Prime Minister of Canada

Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A2

via email

RE: Urgent repatriation of Canadians detained in northeast Syria

Prime Minister:

As members of the legal community, we write to express our serious concern regarding the Canadian government’s continuing refusal to repatriate all Canadians detained in camps and prisons in northeast Syria[1] – urgent repatriation being “the only international law-compliant response,” in the assessment of the UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights.[2]

Indeed, on January 20, the Federal Court of Canada ordered several of the detained Canadian men returned under section 6(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees Canadian citizens the right to enter Canada: a protection for all Canadians against banishment and the concomitant expulsion from the “right to have rights.”[3] Yet instead of honouring this decision that gives meaningful life to Charter provisions, the federal government is appealing it. In doing so, it is not only prolonging the dire and life-threatening conditions of the detainees, but also putting forward the troubling legal argument that the Court, in performing its essential function of upholding basic rights, is impermissibly “interfering in the exercise of Crown prerogative over matters of foreign affairs.”

This is particularly disturbing given the scale of rights violations involved. As described by the Federal Court and documented by UN experts and international human rights organizations, the deplorable conditions and abuses experienced by Canadian and other detainees in northeast Syria include: long-term, extrajudicial, indefinite, and in many cases incommunicado detention without the possibility of trial;[4] torture and ill-treatment;[5] life-threatening denial of food, water, sanitation, shelter, and medical treatment;[6] failure to provide education;[7] sexual violence and exploitation, particularly against women and children;[8] extreme physical danger for children, at least 371 of whom died in just one of the camps (al-Hol) in 2019 alone, including from malnutrition, dehydration, tent fires, shooting, stabbing, and drowning in open sewage pits;[9] and child separation,[10] including the mass “culling, separation and warehousing of adolescent boys from their mothers” in “detention facilities [where they] endure untreated war injuries, missing limbs, and severe trauma.”[11] Such treatment violates international and Canadian constitutional provisions protecting the rights to life, liberty, security of the person, fair trials, equality, and of children; and prohibiting secret and arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances, collective punishment, and torture and ill-treatment.[12]

Thirty-five countries have done what the Federal Court has asked the Federal government to do: repatriate its citizens.[13] States that have repatriated their citizens to date include Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, and the United States.[14] More than 6,000 detainees across 35 countries have been repatriated.[15] Commending Kyrgyzstan’s decision to repatriate 59 detainees from the camps this February, the US Department of State emphasized: “Repatriation is the only durable solution to this urgent humanitarian and security situation […] We urge all governments to follow Kyrgyzstan’s example and repatriate their nationals.”[16]

Calls for repatriation have now been issued by US President Joe Biden, the International Committee of the Red Cross, 22 United Nations experts, the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, and the Kurdish authorities administering the camps and prisons.[17] The conditions for release outlined by Kurdish authorities could not be expressed more simply: that Canada write a letter requesting the detainees’ release, that Canada ensure travel documents are ready for issue, and that a Canadian representative appear in northeast Syria for a handover signing. The United States military has pledged to provide the security and resources necessary to fly detainees home.

The Canadian government’s highly restrictive approach to repatriation is incompatible with international and constitutional legal norms. For example, Global Affairs Canada’s “Policy Framework [for repatriation] appears drafted to exclude the Canadian men [… in which] case the Policy Framework as presently advised could not withstand subsection 6(1) Charter scrutiny,” as the Federal Court concluded.[18] Moreover, the refusal to admit detained non-Canadian mothers with their Canadian children effectively mandates forcible child-parental separation, in contravention of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.[19]

Canada’s failure to repatriate perpetuates a pattern of Canadian governmental complicity with the overseas torture, arbitrary detention, and forced exile of Muslim Canadians, as recorded in the two official inquiries on the cases of Maher Arar, Ahmad Abou El-Maati, Abdullah Almalki, and Muayyed Nureddin,[20] and multiple legal complaints.[21]

Instead of advancing legal interpretations that would vitiate fundamental rights protections, we call on the Canadian government to honour the Federal Court’s repatriation order; to work to urgently bring back all Canadian detainees and, with respect to detained children, any non-Canadian caregiving parents as well; and to finally address the underlying deficiencies in Canadian policies – many of them identified in unimplemented recommendations from the 2006 Arar Inquiry[22] – that have led to this deplorable situation, to prevent any future recurrence.

We urge this course of action both to address the grave human rights concerns in these pressing cases, and to convey a strong and much-needed message that Canada does indeed take its human rights obligations seriously in a world and at a time when those universal principles are increasingly undermined.

 

Signed by:

  1. Allan Rock, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, former Ambassador to the United Nations and President Emeritus of the University of Ottawa
  2. Sharry Aiken, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University
  3. Paul Champ, constitutional lawyer
  4. Kent Roach, Professor of Law, University of Toronto Faculty of Law
  5. Carmen Cheung Ka-man, Senior Fellow, Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto
  6. Alex Neve, Adjunct Professor, International Human Rights Law, University of Ottawa
  7. Natasha Bakht, Professor, Shirley Greenberg Chair for Women and the Legal Profession, University of Ottawa
  8. Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, Executive Director & General Counsel, Canadian Civil Liberties Association
  9. Husein Panju, Chair of Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association
  10. Michael Byers, Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law, University of British Columbia
  11. Michael Lynk, Former United Nations Human Rights Special Rapporteur
  12. John Packer, Director of the Human Rights Research and Education Centre, University of Ottawa
  13. Obiora Okafor, Professor of International Law, Johns Hopkins University, Washington DC
  14. Aviva Basman, President, Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers
  15. Tiffany Butler, Executive Director, National Association of Women and the Law
  16. Tim McSorley, national coordinator, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group
  17. Yavar Hameed, human rights lawyer
  18. Azeezah Kanji, legal academic and journalist
  19. Nicholas Pope, lawyer, Hameed Law
  20. Irina Ceric, Assistant Professor, University of Windsor Faculty of Law
  21. Jasminka Kalajdzic, Associate Professor
  22. Sarah Beamish, lawyer
  23. Dr. Ardi Imseis, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University
  24. Constance MacIntosh, Professor of Law, Schulich School Of Law, Dalhousie University
  25. Faisal Bhabha, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
  26. Dania Majid, Arab Canadian Lawyers Association
  27. André Capretti, lawyer
  28. Dr. Ashwini Vasanthakumar, Associate Professor, Queen’s Law School
  29. Faisal Kutty, Associate Professor of Laws at Southwestern Law School and Affiliate Faculty at Rutger University’s Center for Security, Race and Rights
  30. Robert J. Currie, Professor of Law, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
  31. Michael Bossin, lawyer, sessional professor, Queen’s University, University of Ottawa
  32. François Crépeau, Professor of International Law, McGill University
  33. Matthew Behrens, Legal Researcher, Stop Canadian Involvement in Torture
  34. Suzanne Larose, Paralegal / Community Legal Caseworker at CLSO
  35. Laïla Demirdache, Staff Lawyer, Community Legal Services of Ottawa & Sessional Professor, University of Ottawa
  36. Catherine Morris, lawyer (non-practicing)
  37. Christelle Azzi, lawyer
  38. Charis Kamphuis, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University
  39. Xan Dagenais, Research Coordinator, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group
  40. Dr. Kjell Anderson, Director, Master of Human Rights program University of Manitoba
  41. Aditya Rao, lawyer
  42. Laura MacLean, Staff Lawyer, Community Legal Services of Ottawa
  43. Esther Dionne Desbiens, lawyer
  44. Fatma Alobeid, JD Candidate, University of Ottawa
  45. Professor Martha Jackman, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa
  46. Raphael Vagliano, international human rights lawyer
  47. Fawad Siddiqui, lawyer
  48. Aadil Nathani, lawyer
  49. Élaine Simon, staff lawyer at Community Legal Services of Ottawa
  50. Mahmoud Khodr, financial controller
  51. Justin Safayeni, lawyer
  52. Mudasir Marfatia, General Counsel and Vice President, Legal at First Ontario
  53. Del Atwood, retired judge
  54. Imran Abdool, Lecturer, University of Western Ontario
  55. Lex Gill, Lawyer and Course Lecturer, Faculty of Law, McGill University
  56. Sujith Xavier, Associate Professor University of Windsor Faculty of Law
  57. Pearl Eliadis, human rights lawyer and associate professor (professional), McGill University
  58. Nicole Filion, lawyer, former coordinator, Ligue des droits et libertés
  59. Mohamed El Rashidy, lawyer
  60. Christopher Campbell-Duruflé, Assistant Professor, Lincoln Alexander School of Law, Toronto Metropolitan University
  61. Hilary Evans Cameron, Assistant Professor, Lincoln Alexander School of Law
  62. Kareem Ibrahim, lawyer
  63. Naseer (Irfan) Syed, lawyer
  64. Alastair Clarke, immigration lawyer based in Winnipeg
  65. Basmah Osman, Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association
  66. Mary Boyce, lawyer
  67. Karina Thompson, lawyer
  68. Amina Younas, corporate lawyer, Vancouver
  69. Rebeka Lauks, lawyer
  70. Mustafa Khan, lawyer
  71. Omair Jafrani, lawyer, McCarthy Tetrault
  72. Aziza Hirsi, Canadian Association of Somali Lawyers
  73. Denis Barrette, lawyer and activist, Ligue des droits et libertés
  74. Aaqib Raza, Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association
  75. Rabiat Akande, Osgoode Hall Law School
  76. Adrian A. Smith, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
  77. Mahvish Mian, Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association
  78. Andrew Brouwer, lawyer
  79. Kristin Marshall, lawyer and educator
  80. Daniel Sheppard, lawyer
  81. Sonia Lawrence, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School
  82. Adriel Weaver, lawyer
  83. Nuzhat Jafri, Canadian Council of Muslim Women
  84. Julia Sande, lawyer
  85. Roxana Parsa, lawyer
  86. Aleem Bharmal, KC, human rights lawyer
  87. Jacqueline Bonisteel, immigration lawyer
  88. Meagan Johnston, lawyer
  89. Susan B. Boyd, Professor Emerita, Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia
  90. Mohammad Fadel, Professor of Law, University of Toronto Faculty of Law
  91. Cheryl Milne, Executive Director, David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights
  92. Asad Kiyani, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Victoria
  93. Suzanne Zaccour, lawyer and researcher
  94. Margaret Keys, lawyer
  95. Emma Wilson, lawyer
  96. Eileen Myrdahl, lawyer
  97. Kyong-ae Kim, retired lawyer
  98. Safiyya Ahmad, Articling Student, BC Civil Liberties Association
  99. Kat Owens, lawyer
  100. Ga Grant, human rights lawyer
  101. Meghan McDermott, Policy Director, BC Civil Liberties Association
  102. Mehreen Mulla, lawyer
  103. Coral Lyster, lawyer
  104. Dan Shoom, lawyer
  105. Brenda McPhail, Director, Privacy Technology & Surveillance Program, Canadian Civil Liberties Association
  106. Cara Zwibel, Director, Fundamental Freedoms Program, Canadian Civil Liberties Association
  107. Makaela Peters, lawyer
  108. Sherry MacLeod, lawyer
  109. Karen Coulter, retired lawyer
  110. Kristina Cooke, lawyer
  111. Omar Chu, Community Legal Worker
  112. Ellen Campbell, lawyer
  113. Asiya Hirji, lawyer
  114. Ibrahim Danial, Director, Downtown Muslim Professional Network

[1] https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/human-rights-and-citizenship-abandoned-in-ne-syria-a-special-issue-of-the-global-justice-journal.

[2] https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-terrorism/return-and-repatriation-foreign-fighters-and-their-families.

[3] https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/522819/index.do?; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_31.

[4] https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/06/29/bring-me-back-canada/plight-canadians-held-northeast-syria-alleged-isis-links; https://www.justsecurity.org/85049/repatriating-alleged-isis-linked-men-from-northeast-syria-the-start-of-judicial-responses-to-the-political-stalemate/.

[5] https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/06/29/bring-me-back-canada/plight-canadians-held-northeast-syria-alleged-isis-links; https://stj-sy.org/en/detainees-tortured-and-maltreated/.

[6] https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/sites/default/files/documents/MSB141137%28High%29.pdf.

[7] https://www.savethechildren.net/news/children-abandoned-their-governments-are-%E2%80%98wasting-away%E2%80%99-syrian-camps-%E2%80%93-save-children.

[8] https://www.rightsandsecurity.org/assets/downloads/Europes-guantanamo-THE_REPORT.pdf, https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/sites/default/files/documents/MSB141137%28High%29.pdf, https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/assistant-secretary-general-humanitarian-affairs-and-deputy-emergency-relief-coordinator-ms-joyce-msuya-briefing-security-council-humanitarian-situation-syria-29-august-2022, https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/syria-un-human-rights-chief-condemns-brutal-killing-two-girls-alarmed-sharp-rise-violence-al-hol-camp, https://syria.unfpa.org/en/news/without-rights-without-options-birthing-without-skilled-birth-attendant-al-hol-camp.

[9] https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/01/27/revictimizing-victims-children-unlawfully-detained-northeast-syria.

[10] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/02/syria-un-experts-alarmed-reports-boys-taken-camp-roj-de-facto-authorities.

[11] https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Terrorism/SR/UNSRCT_Position_human-rights-of-boys-adolescents-2021_final.pdf.

[12] Charter of Rights and Freedoms, sections 7, 9, 12, and 15; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, articles 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 24; International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, articles 11, 13; International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance; Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT%2FC%2F75%2FD%2F922%2F2019&Lang=en (decision by the UN Committee Against Torture finding France in violation of the Convention for failing to take effective measures to protect its nationals in the camps); Convention on the Rights of the Child; Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, article 7; https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/collective-punishments; https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/01/27/revictimizing-victims-children-unlawfully-detained-northeast-syria; https://www.justsecurity.org/85049/repatriating-alleged-isis-linked-men-from-northeast-syria-the-start-of-judicial-responses-to-the-political-stalemate/.

[13] https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/01/27/revictimizing-victims-children-unlawfully-detained-northeast-syria.

[14] https://www.rightsandsecurity.org/action/resources/global-repatriations-tracker.

[15] https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/01/27/revictimizing-victims-children-unlawfully-detained-northeast-syria.

[16] https://www.state.gov/u-s-welcomes-kyrgyzstans-repatriation-of-nationals-from-northeast-syria/.

[17] https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/joe-biden-urges-western-allies-to-bring-back-isis-families-held-in-syria-sng77cngg; https://www.icrc.org/en/document/remarks-fabrizio-carboni-icrc-near-and-middle-east-regional-director-record; https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2021/02/syria-un-experts-urge-57-states-repatriate-women-and-children-squalid-camps; https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/02/syria-un-experts-alarmed-reports-boys-taken-camp-roj-de-facto-authorities; https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/FAAE/report-7/;

[18] https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/522819/index.do?, para 190.

[19] Article 9, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.

[20] https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/295791/publication.html; https://secretlaw.omeka.net/items/show/74.

[21] For example, relating to the cases of Abousfian Abdelrazik (https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/56734/index.do), Omar Khadr (https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/4638/index.do), and Mohamedou Slahi (https://files.constantcontact.com/3ffcf3a6301/2c1019a8-43eb-487e-b54d-6e5f7be42aab.pdf).

[22] https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/295791/publication.html.

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

ICLMG testifies on Islamophobia in Canada at Senate committee

ICLMG’s National Coordinator, Tim McSorley, presented on Islamophobia in Canada at the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights on March 20, 2023. Read the transcript of his intervention below.

Watch the full session here

The other witnesses were:

  • Fahad Ahmad, Assistant Professor, Toronto Metropolitan University (As an Individual)
  • Thomas Juneau, Associate Professor, University of Ottawa (As an Individual)
  • Barbara Jackman, Lawyer, Jackman and Associates (As an Individual)
  • Abdul Nakua, Executive Member (Muslim Association of Canada)

TRANSCRIPT

Thank you, Senators, for having me.

Our coalition’s focus is on the impacts of national security and anti-terrorism laws in Canada, and our country’s role and actions throughout the so-called War on Terror, on civil liberties and fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and international human rights agreements.

Through our work, we have observed the constant and undeniable problem of racial, religious and political profiling, abetted by the vague and overreaching definitions of terrorism and national security found in Canada’s laws and policies. The most pervasive of this profiling has been the targeting of Muslims, Arabs, and those perceived to be Muslim or Arab, as the leading threat to the security of Canadians, despite evidence to the contrary.

This systemic Islamophobia has had a tangible, negative impact on Muslims not just in Canada but around the world.

When thinking of this impact, we believe it is important that we remember the victims and survivors of these laws, and listen to their words. Those who have directly experienced the most drastic forms of rights-violations must be included in our policy discussions if we hope to truly address these problems.

I want to share some of the words of Mohamedou Ould Slahi, who was renditioned from his home in Mauritania, and eventually imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay prison for 14 years, where he faced horrific acts of mistreatment and torture. All of this was based on faulty intelligence provided to the United States by Canadian intelligence agencies. Last May, Mr. Slahi told reporters with the Middle East Eye:

“I want Canada to tell the world this was a mistake… I want to clear my name. This is very important to me. …

“Without the Canadian government, I would never have been kidnapped. Without the Canadian government, I would never have been selected for the torture programme. …

“Instead of the protection I was seeking, I was literally thrown under the bus. …

“I just wanted an apology and I want them to give me back my papers that they took away, because I need a life – because my country won’t give me a passport. …

“I want to be able to go to Canada freely, and meet my readers and meet my supporters, and do my talks in all the cities in Canada. Because I love the Canadian people.”

Canada has ignored his request for an apology, forcing Mr. Slahi to pursue justice the only way he can: through the courts. His is just one tragic, and enraging, case among many.

Others who have also faced mistreatment or torture either at the hands of or with the complicity of Canada in the name of counter-terrorism include: Maher Arar, Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad El Maati, Muayyed Nureddin, Omar Khadr, Mohamed Harkat, Hassan Diab, Abousfian Abdelrazik, Benamar Benatta, Khalid Awan, and more. It is no coincidence that these are all Muslim men.

Over the past two decades, studies have repeatedly documented the disproportionate impact of national security measures on Muslims in Canada. For example, a 2019 study found that 98% of individuals prosecuted under Criminal Code anti-terrorism provisions have been Muslims or linked to Muslim groups. The vast majority of these cases did not involve any executed act of violence, whereas most white perpetrators of actual mass violence have not been prosecuted as terrorists. Our own research has shown the disproportionate, unsupported and prejudiced targeting of Muslim charities by the CRA under the guise of countering terrorist financing.

Other examples include:

  • Discrimination and profiling in immigration
  • Racial profiling at the border and while traveling, including via the Passenger Protect Program (No Fly List)
  • Information sharing with rights-violating regimes
  • Harassment of Muslims at work, on campus and in their places of worship

In recent years, laws like the Anti-Terrorism Act, 2015 and the National Security Act, 2017 have expanded national security powers without adequate rights-protections, transparency and oversight, and have not gone far enough to address the profiling and systemic discrimination faced by Muslims in Canada.

If the federal government truly wishes to address Islamophobia, it must forego policies that are predicated on the vague and politically malleable idea of “terrorism”.

Instead, what is needed is legislative reform, real accountability, and justice for the survivors of rights violations in the name of counter-terrorism. This includes

  1. Rescinding rights-violating anti-terrorism laws, including CSIS threat disruption powers
  2. Increase resources for and augment the powers of review and oversight agencies, including independent review of the CBSA
  3. Establishing clear accountability mechanisms, including to address CSIS breaches of duty of candour
  4. Mandate the collection of disaggregated race- and religion-based data to inform policy
  5. End the prejudiced audits of Muslim charities under the guise of combatting terrorist financing in the charitable sector
  6. Re-examine resources granted to national security agencies with a goal of re-allocating resources towards solutions that promote mental and physical health and well-being, and combat exclusion, prejudices, discrimination, and poverty

Finally, justice for the victims of counter-terrorism abuses would show a concrete change in approach and undermine the pervasive, unfounded image of Muslims posing a threat to the security of Canada. This must include but is not limited to:

  1. Immediate action to safely repatriate all Canadians currently detained in North Eastern Syria
  2. Lifting Mohamed Harkat’s security certificate and ending his deportation proceedings
  3. Calling on the French government to end all proceedings against Dr. Hassan Diab and committing to no new extradition.
  4. The resolution of the case of Mohamedou Ould Slahi and an apology from the Canadian government for its role in his mistreatment and torture
  5. The resolution of the case of Abousfian Abdelrazik and an apology from the Canadian government for its role in his mistreatment and torture
  6. Requesting a transfer of Abdulrahman El Bahnasawy from US prison to Canada, where he could at a minimum be supported by his family, community and mental health services while he serves out his sentence

Thank you for your time.

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

National security review of Canada Revenue Agency welcome, but should not delay immediate action

OTTAWA, March 15, 2023 – The International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group (ICLMG) is welcoming the announcement from the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) that it will be reviewing the activities of the Canada Revenue Agency’s Review and Analysis Division (RAD). This was a key recommendation in ICLMG’s report on the CRA’s prejudiced audits of Muslim charities, released in June 2021.

However, this review should not be used by the government as an excuse to further delay action to address the documented and ongoing systemic discrimination faced within the Muslim community. This includes the immediate suspension of RAD audits.

“For too long, the CRA and RAD have operated without adequate review or oversight. We know that in national security, secrecy allows problems to fester and is used to obscure the harmful impacts of counter-terrorism practices. So we are glad to see the NSIRA taking on this important task,” said Tim McSorley, national coordinator of the ICLMG.  “At the same time, for two years the government has had documented evidence of grave problems with the work carried out by RAD, and has failed to take concrete action. This review cannot be an excuse to delay further. RAD’s work must be halted.”

In July 2021, following the publication of ICLMG’s report, among others, and the issue being a central concern at the federal National Summit on Islamophobia, Minister of Revenue Diane Lebouthillier conferred a study of the issue to Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson.

However, The Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson, François Boileau, revealed at a hearing of the Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights in November 2022 that his office was barred from accessing key information and documents needed to carry out its review for national security reasons, among other issues.

The NSIRA has the necessary security clearance to be able to access these documents; this is why the ICLMG had recommended in its report that the NSIRA was the appropriate body to investigate this issue.

The ICLMG also recognizes the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson’s ongoing and dedicated work on this issue, and believes that the Ombudsperson’s report will provide important, complementary findings and recommendations to the eventual NSIRA report.

The ICLMG also continues to call on the federal government to act on the other recommendations in its report, namely:

  • That the Minister of National Revenue declare an immediate moratorium on the targeted audit of Muslim charities by RAD until the review has concluded. This does not preclude the audits of Muslim charities selected at random by the CRA outside of RAD.
  • That the Ministry of Finance revisit the anti-terror regulatory, policy and legislative landscape, particularly the 2015 National Risk Assessment (NRA) and its impact, particularly on the Muslim community.
  • That the federal government amend the NSIRA Act to allow for complaints from the public regarding the CRA’s national security-related activities.
  • That NSIRA and the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) coordinate to carry-out regular reviews of the CRA’s anti-terrorism activities – including the Charities Directorate and RAD – going forward.

The full report is available at: https://iclmg.ca/prejudiced-audits/

More information:
Tim McSorley, national coordinator
International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group
(613) 241-5298

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

Page 11 of 99« First...910111213...203040...Last »