Author Archives: ICLMG CSILC

What we’ve been up to in the first half of 2026: Help us protect civil liberties for the rest of the year!

Credit: Tom Bastin/Flickr CC BY 2.0

Here is what we’ve accomplished in the first half of 2026,
thanks to your support:

Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act

Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, was introduced on March 12, 2026. If adopted, this bill will lower the threshold for law enforcement agencies to gain access to personal data of people in Canada, as well as force companies to modify their systems to facilitate government surveillance and data collection. This would include forcing online platforms to retain metadata about users – revealing who they talk to, and when and how, where they travel and more – for up to six months, a practice previously struck down by EU courts for violating privacy rights. They could also be ordered to install backdoors that Pocketlabs, Meta, Apple, NordVPN and more warn will seriously weaken protections such as encryption, rendering it meaningless. Signal has even stated that it will leave Canada if C-22 is adopted. The orders could all be made in secret, under indefinite non-disclosure orders. All of this would have ramifications on the right to privacy, as well as freedom of expression and association. In a deeply undemocratic move, the government passed a motion stopping debate on dozens of amendments at Committee, and there was no recorded vote at 3rd reading in the House. C-22 is now in the Senate.

Since the bill was introduced, the ICLMG:

Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act

On June 10, 2026, the federal government introduced Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act. The bill includes new requirements for online platforms and AI chatbot providers, age verification, and a new Digital Safety commission with broad, discretionary powers. Despite its title, the bill could potentially regulate a long list of services including cloud storage, online gaming, and message boards. C-34 repeats much of the contents of Part 1 of the last parliament’s unpassed Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act. Regarding our mandate, one similarity with C-63 is the (redundant and problematic) inclusion of “terrorist & violent extremist content” as an online harm alongside “violent content”. We have the same criticism we had with C-63: regulations around content that incites violence capture terrorist content and avoid the potential censoring of unpopular, unsavory or dissident content that can be falsely portrayed as extremist or terrorist (such as solidarity with Palestinians). A new aspect of C-34 is the introduction of a new definition of “terrorism and violent extremism” which is broader than what is currently in the Criminal Code. Since the tabling of the bill, we’ve:

Help us fight for justice and human rights.

Please donate to the ICLMG!

Border & immigration bill C-12

The government tabled Bill C-12, the Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act, in October 2025, as a response to critiques of Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act (now shelved thanks to civil society advocacy and public outrage), particularly around privacy violations. However, the bill replicated Bill C-2’s anti-migrant and anti-refugee provisions, such as: limiting the ability of individuals to claim asylum in Canada, in violation of international human rights law; allowing the mass cancellation or suspension of the processing of immigration documents (ex: visas and permanent residency cards) for entire groups of people, including individuals from certain countries; among others. With support of opposition parties and time limits put by the Liberal government on Senate committees studying the bill, Bill C-12 was adopted in March 2026.

Since January, the ICLMG:

  • Created an action against Bill C-12 targeting the Senate.
  • Testified against C-12 at Senate committee and submitted a brief that was used by several Senators to introduce amendments that were, unfortunately, rejected.
  • Participated in Civil Society Senate Briefing on Bill C-12
  • Signed onto a press release condemning the adoption of Bill C-12 as an attack on refugee and migrant rights in Canada.

Bill C-9: The Combatting Hate Act

Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, was introduced in September 2025. The bill is aimed at preventing hate crimes but instead threatens the Charter rights and civil liberties of all people in Canada, including those communities that the government wishes to help protect. Bill C-9 will give police discretionary powers to decide whether certain symbols are hateful as well as determine the motivations and intentions of protesters, and would create new categories of buildings and infrastructure around which these new rules would apply. These new powers, combined with increased jail sentences, will significantly undermine free expression and dissent, sending a chill amongst those who would otherwise take part in protests. This bill is highly alarming, especially in the context of the crackdown on Palestinian solidarity and other movements. The government passed a motion to force debate to stop at committee on this bill as well. It became law in June.

Since last year, the ICLMG:

Impacts of Countering Terrorism Financing

We continue to be heavily engaged in monitoring and addressing the impacts of Canada’s counter terrorism financing regime, especially its effects on civil society, civic space and international assistance. Since last December, we:

  • Continued to engage in Finance Canada’s dialogue sessions with civil society, including:
    • attending GoC-NPO dialogue sessions on de-risking and the humanitarian authorization regime
    • providing feedback on draft terms of reference for a permanent Dialogue table
  • Spoke on a panel regarding counter-terrorism financing, de-risking and the impact on the charitable and humanitarian sector at the Charity Resilience conference organized by the Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council (CMPAC)
  • Continued to regularly meet with the legal working group on counterterrorism and aid to discuss the impacts and ramifications of the Criminal Code’s humanitarian and international assistance authorization regime.
  • Were awarded a grant from the TMFoundation for a research report and advocacy campaign on counter-terrorism financing, de-risking and impact on Muslim-led and humanitarian charities
  • Presented at the Ottawa Civic Space Summit organized by Cooperation Canada on the panel: “Defend Humanity: When Closing Civic Space Constrains Humanitarian Response”
  • Spoke at the Canadian Institute’s 25th Anniversary Anti-Money Laundering & Financial Crimes Conference on a panel about Canada’s 2026 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) evaluation, sharing ICLMG’s concerns about Canada’s approach to countering terrorist financing in the charitable sector and the need for reforms.

Combatting Islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism

Opposing Canada’s complicity in torture

  • In early 2026, the new Syrian regime attacked Kurdish forces, leading the US to transfer/render detainees from North East Syria to Iraq, despite reports that Iraq remains a country rife with arbitrary detention, torture, a systemic failure to conduct fair trials, and execution in so-called national security cases. In March 2026, the United Nations Human Rights Committee called on Canada to repatriate 14 Canadian men and children (as well as two mothers of the children) in order to end what has in some cases been upwards of a decade of arbitrary detention under appalling conditions in north-eastern Syria and, more recently, in Iraq. On both occasions, we updated and reshared our action calling on Canada to repatriate all Canadians and mothers of Canadian children.
  • June 26th was the United Nations’ International Day in Support of Victims of Torture. In recognition of that day, the ICLMG sent three letters to the Canadian government calling on them to stop their complicity in torture in three different cases – and we updated and re-shared our actions related to the first two cases:
    1. letter to the Minister of Public Safety, calling on him to stop the deportation to torture proceedings against Mohamed Harkat once and for all. The letter contains important new developments that support allowing Moe Harkat’s to stay in Canada, including the recent decision from a Federal Court Justice ruling as unreasonable a Minister’s delegate decision stating that protection against refoulement to torture didn’t apply to Moe Harkat, despite his being a UN Convention refugee.
    2. letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, calling on her to repatriate all Canadians arbitrarily detained in northeast Syria, and now in Iraq, in life-threatening conditions akin to torture. This letter also shares important updates including the call from the UN Human Rights Committee for Canada to repatriate all its citizens from NE Syria and Iraq, and the recent report from Human Rights Watch that warns about unfair trials, torture and the common use of death penalty in Iraq.
    3. letter to the Minister of Justice, calling on the Canadian government to swiftly implement the apology and compensation we are confident the federal court will include in its upcoming decision regarding Abousfian Abdelrazik’s lawsuit against the government for its role in his illegal detention and torture in Sudan.

No-Fly List

In February 2026, the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency released a report which offers an unprecedented look at the internal workings of Canada’s no fly list regime, formally known as the Passenger Protect Program (PPP). NSIRA’s troubling findings reaffirm the fact that secret lists based on overly broad national security concerns are a recipe for rights violations. We sent an email and published a statement urging the Government to take immediate action to address the serious concerns with Canada’s No Fly List regime following this independent review.

Artificial Intelligence

  • We continue to monitor the government’s actions re: AI and national security.
  • We supported the launch of the “People’s Consultation on AI” in response to the government’s inadequate and rushed 30-day “consultation” that mostly took industry into account.
  • We made our own submission to the People’s Consultation on AI.

Foreign interference

In February 2026, the ICLMG sent its comments to the federal government for their 30-day consultation on their proposed Regulations for the Foreign Influence Transparency and Accountability Act (which was part of Bill C-70, the Combatting Foreign Interference Act, which was rushed through Parliament in May and June 2024).

Anti-terrorism, national security & international bodies

We continue to do work at the international level. Since December, the ICLMG:

  • Attended a meeting and sent comments to the Canadian Delegation for the review of Canada’s 7th report on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  • Participated in the CSO Coalition on Human Rights and Counterterrorism’ UN working group, analyzing and providing feedback on the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy and the Coalition’s response.

And more!

  • Nous avons écrit un article intitulé “Montée autoritariste : le Canada n’y échappe pas!” pour le plus récent numéro de la revue de la Ligue des droits et libertés (it will be available to read online and in English as well soon).
  • The ICLMG joined more than a hundred prominent law and human rights experts, labour sector leaders and civil society organizations in warning that the proposed amendments to the Red Tape Reduction Act in Bill C-15 set Canada on a dangerous anti-democratic track.
  • We published our News Digest every other week, which is distributed to thousands of people and has received numerous accolades.

+ Check out the News Digest archive if you’ve missed some of our issues.

+ If you know anyone interested in receiving it, send them an invite to sign up!

ICLMG IN THE MEDIA

The Carney government’s expanding power to identify Canadians online, access their data—and punish them, Graeme Gordon, The Hub, July 6, 2026

Coalition says feds need to ensure C-9 doesn’t create a ‘chilling effect’ on protests, Marco Vigliotti, June 19, 2026

Open Letter: Bill C-22, An Act respecting lawful access, The Internet Society, The Hill Times, Spring 2026

Bill to help authorities probe online activities raises widespread privacy fears, Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 10 May 2026

Réforme migratoire : montée des critiques face aux risques pour la santé, Paloma Martínez Méndez, Radio-Canada, 1 May 2026

Carney’s Attack on Refugees and Migrants: Bill C-12 and cutting refugees’ access to healthcare pave a dangerous path forward, Rahul Balasundaram, The Leveller, 21 April 2026

Premières Nations, premières victimes de l’espionnage politique, Alexandre Popovic, Pivot, 20 April 2026

Criticism of Bill C-12 grows over risks to the health of refugees and migrants, Paloma Martínez Méndez, Radio-Canada International, 3 April 2026

Bill C-12 curbing asylum, immigration rights becomes law amid warnings of court challenges, Marie Woolfe, The Globe and Mail, 28 March 2026

Anti-hate bill that provoked bitter debate over religious freedom passes the Commons, Marie Woolfe, The Globe and Mail, 27 March 2026

I spoke to over 30 sources about Mark Carney’s first year as prime minister. This is the picture that emerged, Althia Raj, The Toronto Star, 13 March 2026

Documents reveal more about powerful forces behind push for warrantless lawful access, Ken Rubin, The Hill Times, 12 February 2026

Critics, pollsters warn Canadians are wary of AI, want government to set guardrails, The Canadian Press, 21 January 2026

Upholding human rights for Hassan Diab, Sandra Wiens, Quaker Concern, Winter 2026

Check out all coverage of ICLMG in the media here.


What we have planned for the rest of 2026!

We have our work cut out for us! This Liberal government is not only churning out bill after bill that restrict our rights and freedoms, it’s also using nearly every power and tool at its disposal to impose its unpopular and damaging agenda and erode the parliamentary process. In that context, we need all the help we can get!

Your support will allow us to continue our work of defending civil liberties in Canada from the negative impacts of anti-terrorism and national security laws and actions.

There will most likely be new challenges when the House of Commons comes back in the Fall, but right now here is our plan:

  • We will take our fight against the state surveillance bill C-22 to the Senate
  • We will push back against Bill C-34’s expansion of terrorism and violent extremism definitions that could restrict free expression, and addressing the lack of regulation on the use of AI in national security
  • We will continue and deepen our work on the negative impact of countering terrorist-financing and de-risking on Muslim-led and humanitarian charities
  • We will monitor the implementation of Bills C-9 and C-12 that are now law
  • We will continue our work on the following:
    • Advocating with lawmakers and officials to protect civil liberties from the overall negative impact of national security
    • Protecting privacy from government surveillance, including facial recognition, and from attempts to weaken encryption, along with advocating for privacy law reform
    • Advocating for restrictions on Canadian information sharing with the US, including the application of the US No Fly List in Canada
    • Campaigning for the repeal of secretive and rights violating national security lists, such as the Terrorist Entities List and the Canadian No Fly List
    • Pushing back against the rapid expansion of new security measures at the border and the false narrative depicting migrants and refugees as security risks
    • Advocating for rights protection and accountability from border agencies, including by pushing for and monitoring the creation of a new CBSA and RCMP watchdog agency
    • Opposing the escalating repression of free expression, dissent and protest in the name of “countering terrorism,” including the crackdown on protests in support of Palestinian human rights and against the genocide in Gaza.
    • Fighting for Justice for Mohamed Harkat, an end to security certificates, and addressing problems in security inadmissibility
    • Fighting for Justice for Hassan Diab and reforming Canada’s extradition law
    • Calling for the return of Canadian citizens and the non-Canadian mothers of Canadian children, who remain indefinitely detained in Syrian camps and now Iraqi prisons.
    • Pushing for restrictions on the implementation of new foreign interference laws
    • Keeping you and our member organizations informed via the News Digest
    • And much more!

If you think our work is important, please support the ICLMG!

We do not receive any funding from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties so your support is essential to our work.

We are counting on people like you.

Please share widely in your networks via email and on Facebook + Instagram + Bluesky + Twitter

Thank you for your support in protecting civil liberties!

— Xan & Tim

PS: For what we were up to in the second half of 2025, click here!

PPS: For what we’ve been up to since ICLMG was created in 2002, check out our Achievements page!

Stop Canadian government’s complicity in torture!

June 26th is the United Nations’ International Day in Support of Victims of Torture. In recognition of this day, ICLMG has sent three letters to the federal government calling on them to stop the Canadian government’s complicity in torture in three different cases:

  1. letter to the Minister of Public Safety, Gary Anandasangaree, calling on him to stop the deportation to torture proceedings against Mohamed Harkat once and for all. The letter contains important new developments that support allowing Moe Harkat’s to stay in Canada, including the recent decision from a Federal Court Justice ruling as unreasonable a Minister’s delegate decision stating that protection against refoulement to torture didn’t apply to Moe Harkat, despite his being a UN Convention refugee.
  2. letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Anita Anand, calling on her to repatriate all Canadians arbitrarily detained in northeast Syria, and now in Iraq, in life-threatening conditions akin to torture. This letter also shares important updates including a call from the UN Human Rights Committee for Canada to repatriate all its citizens from NE Syria and Iraq, and a recent report from Human Rights Watch that warns about unfair trials, torture and the common use of death penalty in Iraq.
  3. A letter to the Minister of Justice, Sean Fraser, calling on the Canadian government to swiftly implement the apology and compensation we are confident the federal court will include in its upcoming decision regarding Abousfian Abdelrazik’s lawsuit against the government for its role in his illegal detention and torture in Sudan.

Please join us in taking the two following UPDATED actions:

Save Moe Harkat from torture!

Repatriate all Canadians!

Please take action even if you have done so in the past.

Please share on Bluesky + Instagram + Facebook + Twitter

Thank you!

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

Privacy experts and civil liberties groups denounce the Liberal government’s shut down of much-needed debate on dangerous state surveillance bill C-22

The federal government has rammed the controversial Lawful Access Act through Parliament despite massive opposition.

June 18, 2026, OTTAWA – Twenty-one civil liberties organizations, privacy groups and individual experts are deeply alarmed that, late last night, the federal government cut off debate at the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on the very controversial Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act.

Bill C-22 raises significant privacy and security concerns, including that it will:

  • Grant police easier access to our personal information;
  • Allow the government to force companies to create backdoors so police and spy agencies can scoop up our personal data and communications, making online protections like encryption meaningless;
  • Allow the government to order companies to hold on to our personal information for up to a year, creating a treasure trove of data that would serve as a digital map of everyone in Canada, and could be misused, leaked, or targeted by hackers; and
  • Risk more of our information being shared with US intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including for the investigation of acts that are legal in Canada.

MPs have received several thousands of emails from Canadians opposing the bill. Many companies, such as Google, Apple and Meta, have sounded the alarm, especially regarding mandated backdoors into their system that would break encryption. Several, such as Signal, Duck Duck Go and NordVPN, have even threatened to leave Canada if the law passes.

It is even more troubling that the government has passed another undemocratic motion to stop debate on a rights-threatening bill when it faces more than 100 amendments, with only a fraction having been discussed before debate was cut off. The government promised to bring its own amendments to address criticisms of the bill, but they were never fully revealed before the vote, and, because of this motion, did not receive any actual debate at committee.

Bill C-22 is too complex and its impacts too significant to be rushed through. The government should not have used this draconian measure, should have allowed the study of the bill to run its course, and should have ensured that all government and opposition amendments were given full consideration and scrutinized in public. We are urging MPs to denounce the passage of the motion, and the government to change course on C-22 and its undemocratic ways.

Quotes:

“This legislation presents one of the greatest threats to privacy in Canada of the past two decades. Its provisions will weaken the rules governing police access to personal information, all while facilitating a vast expansion of government surveillance. This is another clear case of the decades-long trend of governments using national security as an excuse to erode civil liberties and human rights. We are encouraging all members of parliament to oppose these new powers.” –Tim McSorley, National Coordinator, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group

“Breaking our own privacy with mandated backdoors is a terrible idea at the best of times; and Canada has chosen one of the worst possible moments. Frontier AI has become so good at finding software vulnerabilities that the US government just pulled the most capable model off the market worldwide because of what it could find. While other countries race to patch their vulnerabilities, Canada is poised to do massive self-inflicted damage to our economy and security, unless we drop Part 2 of C-22.” –Matt Hatfield, Executive Director, OpenMedia

‘’Let’s be clear: the current government’s handling of this bill is an affront to democracy. All Canadians should be concerned about what the Carney government has in store for us with the highly controversial C-22 and numerous other bills that lay the groundwork for a surveillance state in which the primacy of “security” trumps civil liberties and privacy protections. Not only is the government abruptly cutting short the committee debate—and thereby ignoring the serious concerns raised by both privacy advocates and businesses—but it is also hiding behind misleading rhetoric that claims opposing C-22 means siding with criminals rather than victims! Such statements are an insult to the intelligence of Canadians. The Ligue des droits et libertés calls on members of Parliament to oppose these anti-democratic practices and to vote overwhelmingly against this bill.’’ –Dominique Peschard, Spokesperson and activist for the Ligue des droits et libertés

“People in Canada deserve legislation that respects and protects their privacy rights, and legislators deserve the opportunity to satisfy themselves that they fully understand the true consequences of Bill C-22 on informational privacy, cybersecurity, and cross-border information sharing before they are called to vote on it for the last time. It is frankly irresponsible to curtail the committee study process on such a comprehensive and consequential piece of legislation.” –Aislin Jackson, Policy Staff Counsel, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association 

Signatories:

International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group
OpenMedia
Ligue des droits et libertés
Privacy and Access Council of Canada
Le Centre de Réfugiés / The Refugee Centre
Centre for Free Expression
British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA)
Table de concertation des organismes au service des personnes réfugiées et immigrantes (TCRI)
Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council (CMPAC)
BC Freedom Of Information and Privacy Association
Clinique pour la justice migrante / Migrant justice clinic
Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA)
Council of Canadians
Start Point Organization
IFEX

Safiyya Ahmad, lawyer
Ümit Kiziltan, researcher
Kate Robertson, Senior Research Associate, Citizen Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto
Ron Deibert O.C., O.Ont., Professor of Political Science and Director of the Citizen Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto
Noura Aljizawi, Senior Researcher, Citizen Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto
Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law

– 30 – 

Media contacts:

Tim McSorley, National Coordinator, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group
613-241-5298, national.coordination@iclmg.ca

Matt Hatfield, Executive Director, OpenMedia
1 (888) 441-2640 ext. 0, press@openmedia.org 

Sharon Polsky, President, Privacy & Access Council of Canada
1 877 746 7222, media@pacc-ccap.ca 

Claude Rioux, Communications manager, Ligue des droits et libertés
514-715-7727, communication@liguedesdroits.ca

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button