News from ICLMG

Justice for Hassan Diab Press Conference

July 27, 2023 – Human rights and legal experts speak out as more than 10,000 people sign petition calling on PM Trudeau to refuse any request for Hassan Diab’s extradition. Opening statements by Hassan Diab, Alex Neve, Rob Currie, and Bernie Farber. Moderated by Tim McSorley (ICLMG). Followed by a period of questions from the participating media. Maeve McMahon and Roger Clark from the Hassan Diab Support Committee, and Tim McSorley are also available to answer questions.

Send a quick email

*****

Des expert.e.s des droits de la personne et des juristes s’expriment alors que plus de 10 000 personnes signent une pétition appelant le Premier ministre Trudeau à refuser toute demande d’extradition d’Hassan Diab. La conférence de presse débute par des déclarations de Hassan Diab, Alex Neve, Rob Currie et Bernie Farber. Animé par Tim McSorley (CSILC). Une période de questions des journalistes suit. Maeve McMahon et Roger Clark du Comité de soutien à Hassan Diab, et Tim McSorley sont également disponibles pour répondre aux questions.

Envoyez un courriel

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

What we’ve been up to so far in 2023: Help us protect civil liberties for the rest of the year!

Bill C-20, Public Complaints and Review Commission Act

Bill C-20 would create a new, independent review agency for both the RCMP and CBSA, the first ever independent review body for the CBSA. ICLMG has:

  • Convened meetings with partner & member orgs to coordinate strategy
  • Met with Liberal MP and Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety Pam Damoff to discuss our views on the bill
  • Met with current members of the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission to discuss how they operate and their views on the bill
  • Submitted a brief to the House Standing Committee on Public Safety, with a particular focus on national security reviews and complaints
  • Sent a joint open letter signed by immigration, refugee, legal, human rights and civil liberties organizations to raise concerns around lack of civil society consultation and invitations to committee hearings

Bill C-26, An Act respecting cyber security and amending the Telecommunications Act

The broad powers granted to government ministers in this bill raise concerns about the potential for secret surveillance, especially given the role of the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) in protecting cybersecurity in Canada. ICLMG has:

  • Partnered with other groups to analyze the bill & strategize on advocacy
  • Organized a meeting with BQ MP and Public Safety critic Kristina Michaud with other civil society groups
  • Participated in a roundtable with staff of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  • Provided feedback and signed on to joint recommendations for amendments to the bill

Bill C-27, Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022

Bill C-27 is the government’s long-promised update to Canada’s private sector privacy law and would enact a new Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA), which raises major concerns given the growing use of AI in surveillance capitalism and government surveillance. ICLMG has:

  • Analyzed and began drafting a brief on the bill
  • Met with the European Centre for Non-profit Law, which has been working to address a similar law at the EU
  • Co-organized a joint letter calling for parties to vote against AIDA
  • Met with the staff of the NDP Industry critic to discuss strategy
  • Was invited to present our analysis of the bill on a panel and participated in an invite-only workshop on AI policy in Canada at Concordia University

Bill C-41: International assistance and anti-terrorism laws

Humanitarian aid and international assistance generally is being hindered by Canada’s anti-terrorism laws, particularly in Afghanistan – a risk ICLMG has warned about for a very long time. In 2023, the government tabled Bill C-41 to ostensibly address the issue through amendments to the Criminal Code. Despite several remaining shortcomings, the bill received royal assent recently. On this topic, ICLMG has:

  • Worked alongside the Aid for Afghanistan campaign and other partner groups to advocate for the government to allow Canadian humanitarian organizations to operate in the country
  • Continued to participate in the campaign’s working group on developing legislative amendments to address the issue, including by creating an exception in the anti-terrorism provisions of the Criminal Code
  • Met with the policy director to the Minister of Public Safety
  • Met with staff from NDP MP Heather McPherson’s office to discuss amendments and strategy on the bill
  • Submitted a brief to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights for their study of the bill: full versionabridged version
  • Issued a media statement in reaction to the tabling of Bill C-41 as well as a statement highlighting remaining concerns regarding non-humanitarian international assistance after the bill received royal assent

Help us fight for justice and human rights.
Donate to the ICLMG!

Canadians detained in Northeastern Syria

In 2023, there have been major developments on this issue, including the repatriation of several Canadians, most of them children, a positive ruling at the Federal Court, and a reversal at the Federal Court of Appeal. ICLMG has:

  • Written to Minister Joly calling for the repatriation of all Canadians detained in northeast Syria
  • Reacted to the Federal Court ruling declaring that Canada must repatriate its citizens & particularly the 4 men imprisoned indefinitely
  • Convened strategy meetings with colleagues to support respondents against the government’s appeal
  • Co-organized an open letter from the Canadian legal community in support of the Federal Court’s ruling
  • Reacted to the Federal Court of Appeal’s negative ruling
  • Updated & promoted our letter-writing campaign calling for repatriation

Justice for Dr Hassan Diab & reform of the Extradition Act

In April 2023, France proceeded with the trial of Dr. Hassan Diab, and in a miscarriage of justice, convicted him in absentia for the 1980 Rue Copernic bombing. We continue to advocate for Dr. Diab’s rights to be protected and for reforms to the Extradition Act, including by:

  • Appearing at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights for its study on extradition reform and contributing to the call from the committee for major reforms to the Extradition Act
  • Reacting to the French court decision & calling for no new extradition
  • Updating our letter writing campaign to Prime Minister Trudeau
  • Meeting with the Hassan Diab Support Committee to discuss strategy
  • Published an open letter signed by more than 130 members of the Canadian legal community following the guilty verdict

Combatting Islamophobia

  • We met with Amira Elghawaby, the federal Special Representative on Combatting Islamophobia, to discuss discuss key issues including Canadians detained in NE Syria, Dr. Hassan Diab, Mohamed Harkat and security certificates
  • We appeared at the Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights for their study on Islamophobia
  • We commemorated the sixth anniversary of the Quebec city Mosque massacre and spread the word on events and resources
  • We met with Prof. Akwasi Owusu-Bempah regarding his study on the collection and sharing of disaggregated race based data by the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
  • We participated on the panel, “Interrogating Islamophobia in the ‘War on Terror’ after two decades” at the Critical Perspectives annual national conference on Criminology and Social Justice.

Countering terrorist financing & prejudiced audits of Muslim charities

In 2023, the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson tasked with investigating the CRA’s prejudiced audits released his report and there have been developments in the targeting of Muslim charities. Our work has included:

  • Publishing an op-ed in the National Post
  • Analyzing and reacting to the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson’s report
  • Raising the issue during our appearance at the Senate Human Rights committee study on Islamophobia
  • Reacting to the targeting of the Muslim Association of Canada

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

As part of our work on accountability, the ICLMG continues to monitor and react to the work of the NSIRA by:

  • Issuing a statement on NSIRA’s decision to review the national security related activities of the CRA’s Review and Analysis Division (RAD), a key recommendation from our 2021 CRA Prejudiced Audits report
  • Issuing a statement in reaction to NSIRA’s report demonstrating grave problems with the CSIS’s use of its threat reduction powers

CSIS accountability and duty of candour

The Canadian Security and Intelligence Service has been found multiple times to have engaged in unlawful activities, and then misled the courts about it. They have violated their duty of candour and misled the public:

CSE, surveillance and cyberwarfare

  • ICLMG was invited to present on issues regarding oversight and the Communications Security Establishment’s cyber powers and their role in surveillance and cyberwarfare at the House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defense
  • ICLMG also met with NDP MP Lindsay Mathyssen, members of the NDDN committee, about their study and recommendations

Facial Recognition Technology (FRT)

ICLMG has continued researching & collaborating with partners to address the threat this surveillance technology poses to our fundamental rights. We have:

  • Participated in the steering committee of a new CCLA-organized coalition on FRT called Right 2 Your Face;
  • Co-signed an open letter from the coalition on FRT regulation & Bill C-27
  • Published an op-ed in the CAUT Bulletin on current trends in surveillance

“Online harms” proposal

We have continued our work on the government’s proposal to combat online harms, including “terrorist content,” by:

  • Participating in meetings of the “Online Harms Network” bringing together various organizations engaging critically on this issue
  • Providing feedback and signing on to a joint “red lines” statement with other civil society members, setting out key provisions that should be considered in eventual online harms legislation

Canada’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR)

Canada is currently taking part in its 4th Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council. In line with previous cycles, the ICLMG has submitted a brief to the Council for consideration in its review.

Civil Society Coalition on Human Rights and Counter-terrorism

The ICLMG continues to participate in the Civil Society Coalition on Human Rights and Counterterrorism. In 2023, this has included:

  • Participating in coalition workstreams on UN policy and on counterterrorism and technology, and general coalition meetings
  • Providing feedback on the coalition’s newly launched website
  • Participating in discussions regarding coalition responses to ongoing negotiations for the 2023 review of the Global Counterterrorism Strategy
  • Joining Coalition colleagues for UN Counterterrorism Executive Directorate consultations on guiding principles on emerging technology and presenting on behalf of ICLMG

UN Counterterrorism Executive Directorate Canada assessment

This year marked the second assessment of Canada’s implementation of UN counterterrorism resolutions by CTED. In response, we:

  • Organized the first ever civil society consultation with CTED during their country visit
  • Organized a group letter calling for Canada to release the eventual assessment publicly

UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights global survey on counterterrorism and civic space

ICLMG participated in a special consultation organized by the SR on the impact of counterterrorism measures on civic space. This included:

  • Participated in the Charity and Security Network’s roundtable to develop a joint brief to the SR’s consultation
  • Organizing the Canadian component of the SR’s North America roundtable, including being invited to present an overview of the situation in Canada and ICLMG’s work


ICLMG IN THE MEDIA

“Taxpayer Ombudsperson goes public over impasse with CRA over Muslim charity audits,” Bill Curry, The Globe and Mail, 5 Dec 2022

“‘More to do’ on systemic barriers facing Muslim charities, Justin Trudeau acknowledges,” Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 7 Dec 2022

Why is the Canadian government still targeting Muslim charities,” Monia Mazigh, Ottawa Citizen, 13 Dec 2022

Inquiry possible into forged papers sent to Muslim charity, Trudeau says,” Robert Fife and Steven Chase, The Globe and Mail, 15 Dec 2022

If the CRA is targeting Muslim-led charities, Canadians deserve to know,” Alex Neve and Leilani Farha, The Globe and Mail, 20 Dec 2023

RCMP declines to probe forged documents implicating Muslim charity in terrorist-related funding,” R. Fife & S. Chase, The Globe and Mail, 22 Dec 2023

2022 Islamophobia In Review: Canada,” Mobashra Tazamal, Bridge Initiative, Georgetown University, 29 Dec 2022

Mendicino open to working with MPs to ‘improve’ much-criticized cybersecurity bill,” Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 10 Jan 2023

Hassan Diab, trial in absentia,” Paul Weinberg, Rabble.ca, 7 Feb 2023

Identity crisis,” Chris Kitching, Winnipeg Free Press, 9 February 2023

CSIS failed to fully consider human toll when disrupting threats, watchdog says,” Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 18 Feb 2023

Government agency for monitoring social media could be legacy of Emergencies Act report,” Anja Karadeglija, Saltwire News, 28 Feb 2023

Intelligence watchdog investigating CRA following Islamophobia claims,” Catherine Tunney, CBC News, 14 March 2023

Civil liberties groups call for immediate moratorium on ‘prejudiced audits’ of Muslim charities pending NSIRA review,” The Hill Times, 21 March 2023

“The problem of systemic bias in CRA audits,” Faisal Kutty and Faisal Bhabha, The Philanthropist Journal, 27 March 2023

Ottawa asks court to dismiss ruling directing it to repatriate 4 men detained in Syria,” Ashley Burke, CBC News, 27 March 2023

Watchdog couldn’t probe charity bias allegations ‘deeply enough’ due to lack of info,” Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 27 March 2023

Taking a closer look at Canada’s spy agency, CSIS,” Gloria Galloway, The Early Edition (CBC Radio), 29 March 2023

Non-profit organizations call on government to protect Muslim charities,” The Canadian Press, 30 March 2023

Federal government’s proposed AI and Data Act deeply flawed,” Lorraine Chisholm, Redeye, Vancouver Cooperative Radio, 31 March 2023

“Muslim charity alleges systemic bias in bid to halt revenue agency’s ‘tainted’ audit,” Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 3 April 2023

Review into Canada Revenue Agency bias has let down Canadian Muslims,” Sarah Mushtaq, National Post, 6 April 2023

Charities find loopholes in ‘broken’ terror laws to help Afghans as MPs study bill,” Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press, 19 April 2023

Civil society groups call on feds to protect privacy, free expression in imminent online harms bill,” Aidan Macnab, Canadian Lawyer Magazine, 24 April 2023

‘A chilling effect’: Muslim charities fall prey to Canada’s double standards,” Umar A Farooq, Middle East Eye, 25 April 2023

Legalized immorality: the scapegoating of Hassan Diab,” Judy Deutsch, Canadian Dimension, 17 May 2023

CRA persecution of Muslim charities counterproductive to anti-radicalization,” Navaid Aziz, National Post, 26 May 2023

Government powers under Canada’s proposed cybersecurity law should be limited: Rights groups, Howard Solomon, IT World Canada, 20 June 2023

MPs call for sanctions on foreign aggressors targeting Canada with disinformation, Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press, 26 June 2023

Check out all coverage of ICLMG in the media here.

We have also published countless reactions on our social media accounts, which continue to reach tens of thousands.

We publish our News Digest every other week, which is distributed to thousands of people and has received numerous accolades.

+ Check out the News Digest archive if you’ve missed some of our issues.

+ If you know anyone interested in receiving it, send them an invite to sign up!


What we have planned for the rest of 2023!

Your support will allow us to continue our work on these issues over the coming months:

  • Ensuring that the Canadian government’s proposals on “online harms” do not violate fundamental freedoms, or exacerbate the silencing of racialized and marginalized voices
  • Protecting our privacy from government surveillance, including facial recognition, and from attempts to weaken encryption, along with advocating for good privacy law reform
  • Addressing the lack of regulation on the use of AI in national security, including proposed exemptions for national security agencies
  • The return of the rest of the Canadian citizens and the non-Canadian mothers of Canadian children indefinitely detained in Syrian camps
  • Greater accountability and transparency for the Canada Border Services Agency
  • Greater transparency and accountability for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service
  • Advocating for the repeal of the Canadian No Fly List, and for putting a stop to the use of the US No Fly List by air carriers in Canada
  • Pressuring lawmakers to protect our civil liberties from the negative impact of national security and the “war on terror”, as well as keeping you and our member organizations informed via the News Digest
  • Publishing a collection of essays written by amazing partners on the work of the ICLMG for our 20th anniversary
  • And much more!


If you think our work is important, please support the ICLMG!

We do not receive any funding from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties so your support is essential to our work.

We are counting on people like you.

Thank you for your support in protecting civil liberties!

— Xan & Tim

PS: For what we were up to in the second half of 2022, click here!

PPS: For what we’ve been up to since ICLMG was created in 2002, check out our Achievements page!

Bill C-41: Changes to anti-terror laws a step forward on humanitarian aid, but leave other forms of vital international assistance behind

On June 21, 2023, the federal government’s legislative solution to allow Canadian organizations to carry out their vital international assistance work in Afghanistan and other regions under de facto control of an entity deemed by the government to be a terrorist group, Bill C-41, received royal assent.

The version of the bill which passed into law was significantly different from the one introduced in March 2023 in the House of Commons. This includes key improvements based on recommendations from the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group (ICLMG) and other civil society organizations. Despite these changes, the ICLMG still maintains deep concerns about aspects of the bill that undermine the provision of important forms of international assistance.

The most significant improvement was an amendment to create, for the first time, an exemption in Canada’s laws on countering terrorist financing for the provision of humanitarian assistance. This change came thanks to concerted pressure from civil society groups, and gives greater certainty to humanitarian organizations in carrying out their work; however, the government must still provide clarification on how this exemption will play out in practice.

At the same time, this exemption does not apply to many Canadian international assistance organizations that carry out vital activities, but which are not exclusively humanitarian in nature, including in regards to provision of health services, defense of human rights, efforts towards peacebuilding and support towards earning a livelihood. These organizations are now required to proceed through an unclear, burdensome and invasive authorization process. 

Among other concerns, this new regime places the onus on these groups to prove they do not violate vaguely defined security assessment rules. These rules allow the Minister of Public Safety to deny an authorization based solely on whether any individual involved in a project, including international partners, has undefined “links” to terrorism or has ever been simply investigated on terrorism grounds.

The ICLMG has documented time and again how such vague rules result in harmful impacts, including: “guilt by association” based only on unsupported allegations; political interference or ministerial discretion based on political expediency; and the promulgation of both systemic and individual bias and racism.

For example, Canadian Muslim charities are disproportionately and unjustifiably investigated for links to terrorist financing, despite the lack of credible evidence and based largely on systemic Islamophobia. Any of the many people who have carried out valuable, selfless work with these charities who may wish to apply for an authorization could now face disqualification simply because of these baseless racial and religiously-motivated investigations.

There is nothing limiting the examination of “links” or “investigations” to within Canada either, meaning that designations or investigations by foreign governments and agencies, including those who more readily deem human rights defenders or political opponents as “terrorists,” could be considered in these assessments. Examples of this abound, including Israel’s designation of six well-respected Palestinian civil society organizations as “terrorist organizations” without any evidence, or the Indian and Egyptian governments’ jailing of human rights activists as “terrorists.”

Other concerns include: 

  • Minimal restrictions around the use of information shared between the Minister of Public Safety and nine other Canadian agencies involved in national security, including CSIS, the RCMP, the CRA and the CSE. The government can also add any other organization to the list of approved entities, including foreign security and intelligence agencies;
  • Overly-broad secrecy rules for any judicial review of a rejected application, denying applicants access to the information being used to deny their application.

The ICLMG is grateful to opposition critics who raised these concerns at committee, but disappointed that they were not corrected before the bill’s adoption. The coalition will continue its work to address these problems, and calls on the government to take action to address them through regulation. The ICLMG will also be closely monitoring the implementation of the regime in order to bring concerns to the mandated one-year review of Bill C-41.

Finally, the ICLMG reiterates its concern that an exemption regime does not address the central problem at the heart of this issue: that Canada’s overly-broad counter-terrorism laws allowed for this situation to occur in the first place. The ICLMG, among others, has long raised concerns that the inherent vagueness and political nature of the word “terrorism” will continue to have unintended consequences, including on Canada’s international human rights and humanitarian obligations, evidenced by the current restrictions on the provision of aid. While an exemption regime may provide a route forward, it avoids how counter-terrorism laws create areas and entities that are considered ‘no-go,’ and continue to primarily and unjustly impact majority-Muslim countries and regions. We renew our call for the government to fundamentally revisit its approach on counter-terrorism laws and their enforcement.

The International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, founded in 2002, is a non-partisan coalition of 44 Canadian civil society organizations from a broad range of sectors that works to defend civil liberties in the context of national security and the so-called “War on Terror.”

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

Page 7 of 99« First...56789...203040...Last »