News from ICLMG

Letter: Criminalization of freedom of expression and international solidarity in Peru

90 organizations including the ICLMG have signed on to this letter sent to the Peruvian authorities

November 17, 2017

Ministro Víctor Ricardo Luna Mendoza Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores

Ministro Enrique Javier Mendoza Ramírez
 Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos

RE: Criminalization of freedom of expression and international solidarity in Peru

Esteemed Minister Luna and Minister Mendoza Ramírez:

The undersigned organizations write with concern over the criminalization of freedom of expression and international solidarity in Peru. In particular, we are alarmed following the harassment and the illegal and arbitrary detention of MiningWatch Canada’s Latin America Program Coordinator Jen Moore and US journalist and filmmaker John Dougherty between April 18 to 23, 2017, as well as their subsequent prohibition from entry to Peru for an indefinite period. We urge you to take all measures necessary to stop this process of criminalization, including to lift the migratory alert that impedes their reentry to Peru and to prevent such a situation from occurring again against them or others.

The detention of Ms. Moore and Mr. Dougherty took place following a public screening of the documentary “Flin Flon Flim Flam” about Hudbay Minerals’ operations in the Americas. This was preceded by defamation in the press, harassment, and police surveillance.

On April 22 in the morning, hours after being detained by police and before having the opportunity to defend themselves, Ms. Moore and Mr. Dougherty were publicly incriminated on the website of the Ministry of Interior of having incited local residents to rise up against mining and of being a threat to public order, implicating them in a series of violent acts in which they did not participate. By acting in this manner, the Peruvian authorities violated the rights of the two researchers to freedom of expression, privacy and due process.

Fearful that they could become victims of further arbitrary abuses from Peruvian authorities, the two voluntarily left Peru on April 23 with plans to continue the process through their legal counsel in Peru. This same day, without any notification or due process, the Superintendent of Migration imposed an indefinite migratory alert against their reentry to the country, outrageously de- termining that showing a film about mining constitutes a threat to public order in Peru.

This process of criminalization is not just a violation of the right to freedom of expression of the two researchers, but also a collective rights violation, considering the fundamental connection between freedom of expression and the exchange of information and communication. In this regard, it is the right of local communities living near Hudbay Minerals’ mine, as well as the general public in the cities of Cusco and Lima, to be able to access available information about the negative impacts of mining.

We believe that the stigmatization in the press and by a public authority, police harassment, illegal and arbitrary detention, and prohibition from entry to Peru of the two researchers are the result of two factors: 1) the privatization of the public security apparatus in Peru; and 2) Hudbay Minerals’ apparent attempt to exert control over what information communities living around its Constancia mine have access to.

With regard to the former, on May 8 of this year, the company publicly confirmed that the national police has a contract with Hudbay Minerals’ Peruvian subsidiary to provide it with security services. This contract subordinates the police to the company and its security needs, creating a serious conflict of interest with their public service role. Representatives of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights acknowledged this at a hearing on this subject in Buenos Aires on May 25, during which Commissioner Margarette May Macaulay stated that contracts between police and private companies should be abolished. On July 19, 2017, the UN Working Group on Business & Human Rights also expressed concern over these contracts after a visit to Peru, noting that they create confusion over the role of the police to first and foremost protect public security, and further undermine confidence in this state institution.

With regard to the latter, while Hudbay has publicly denied having lobbied Peruvian authorities to respond in its favour in this case, the rapid public response of the Minister of the Interior and its explicit expression of support for the company’s interests immediately following Ms. Moore and Mr. Dougherty’s arbitrary detention indicates an unusual level of interest on the part of the Peruvian state in their situation. Furthermore, based on earlier available versions of Hudbay’s contract with police for 24-hour security in the area of its Constancia mine, it is possible that police were obliged to detect and respond in coordination with Hudbay’s personnel to the presence of Ms. Moore and Mr. Dougherty. In addition to other potential involvement, Hudbay personnel were reported to have questioned local community leaders about the film screenings during the days before their detention.

Given the above, the undersigned urge that you take all measures necessary to stop the criminalization of the MiningWatch worker and US journalist, that you order the migratory alert against their reentry to Peru be lifted, and that a full public rectification be published on the Ministry of Interior’s website, and all false accusations against the two be removed. Additionally, we urge you to take all necessary measures to prevent future police surveillance, harassment, arbitrary detention, and criminalization against them and any other researchers, academics, journalists, public speakers, and human rights defenders. Finally, it is vitally important that the privatization of police services and the public security apparatus be brought to a halt, in follow up to the statements of concern made by the IACHR, since it only serves to facilitate the criminalization of dissent in particular in areas where communities are in conflict with extractive industry projects that put them at risk.

Attentively,

1. Acción Colectiva, Guanajuato, México
2. Acción Ecológica, Ecuador
3. Agrupación de Pequeños Regantes y No Regantes Río Mostazal, Chile
4. Asociación de Desarrollo Económico Social Santa Marta (ADES), El Salvador
5. Americas Policy Group, Canada
6. Atlantic Regional Solidarity Network (ARSN), Canada
7. Asociación Amigos de San Isidro Cabañas (ASIC), El Salvador
8. Asociación CEIBA, Guatemala
9. Asociación para el Desarrollo de El Salvador (CRIPDES), El Salvador
10. Bibaani A.C., Oaxaca
11. Bios Iguana A.C., México
12. CAOI
13. Cabildo por las Mujeres de Cuenca, Ecuador
14. Canadian Centre for International Justice (CCIJ)
15. Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE)
16. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), U.S.
17. Centre for Research on Latin America and the Caribbean (CERLAC), Canada
18. Centro Humboldt, Nicaragua
19. Cercle des Premières Nations de l’Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM)
20. CESTAAmigosdelaTierraElSalvador
21. CensatAguaViva-AmigosdelatierraColombia
22. CODETAC, Panamá
23. Colectivo Voces Ecológicas, Panamá
24. Comité Ambiental en Defensa de la Vida, Colombia
25. Comité Chileno por los Derechos Humanos, Montreal, Canada
26. Comité Ixtepecano en Defensa de la Vida y el Territorio, Oaxaca
27. Comité pour les droits humains en Amérique latine (CDHAL), Montreal, Canada
28. Comité Regional de Promoción de Salud Comunitaria (Mesoamerica)
29. Common Frontiers, Canada
30. Confédération des syndicats nationaux (CSN), Québec Casa Panteón, Oaxaca
31. Consejo Tiyat Tlali, Puebla, México
32. Cooperacción, Perú
33. Coordinadora Ambiental Valles en Movimiento, Monte Patria, Chile
34. Coordinadora Ni Una Sola Mina, Costa Rica
35. COPINH, Honduras
36. The Democracy Center, Bolivia/U.S.
37. Earthworks, US
38. ECUARUNARI, Ecuador
39. Education In Action, Ottawa, Canada
40. Environmental Defender Law Center (EDLC)
41. FEDEPAZ, Peru
42. Femmes de diverses origines-Women of Diverse Origins, Montreal, Québec
43. FESPAD, El Salvador
44. First Nations Women Advocating for Responsible Mining, British Columbia, Canada
45. Forest Peoples Programme, U.K.
46. Frente Nacional por la Salud de los Pueblos, Ecuador
47. Fundacion Savia Roja, Ecuador
48. Grufides, Peru
49. Institute for Policy Studies, Global Economy Project, U.S.
50. Instituto Mexicano para el Desarrollo Comunitario AC.
51. International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group (ICLMG), Canada
52. Inter Pares, Canada
53. Justiça nos Trilhos, Brasil
54. Madison Arcatao Sister City Project, US
55. Maritimes-Guatemala Breaking the Silence Network, Canada
56. McGill Research Group Investigating Canadian Mining in Latin America (MICLA)
57. Mining Injustice Solidarity Network (MISN), Toronto
58. Mining Justice Action Committee, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
59. Mining Justice Alliance, Vancouver, British Columbia \, Canada
60. MiningWatch Canada
61. Movimiento Ecologista de Mujeres del Sur, Ecuador
62. Movimiento Mesoamericano en contra del Modelo Extractivo Minero (M4)
63. Movimiento Morelense Contra las Concesiones de Minería a Tajo Abierto por Metales, México 64. Movimiento para la salud de los Pueblos Latinoamerica (MSPLA)
65. Mujeres Jeromeñas Defensoras de la Madre Tierra, Oaxaca
66. Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala (NISGUA)
67. Palenke Alto Cauca – Proceso de Comunidades Negras (Colombia)
68. PlataformaInternacionalcontralaImpunidad
69. Observatorio Latinoamericano de Conflictos Ambientales (OLCA), Chile 70. Observatorio Latinoamericano de Conflictos Mineros (OCMAL)
71. Ontarians for a Just and Accountable Mineral Policy, Canada
72. Organización Fraternal Negra Hondureña, OFRANEH
73. Otros Mundos AC/Chiapas, México
74. People’s Health Movement Canada/Mouvement populaire pour la santé au Canada
75. Procesos Integrales para la Autogestión de los Pueblos (PIAP), México
76. Projet Accompagnement Solidarité Colombie (PASC), Québec
77. Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC)
78. Red Latinoamericana de Mujeres defensoras de Derechos Sociales y Ambientales
79. Red Mexicana de Afectados por la Minería (REMA)
80. Red Muqui, Perú
81. Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta, Colombia
82. Rights Action, Canada
83. SICSAL (Servicios Internacionales Cristianos de Solidaridad con los Pueblos de America Latina — Oscar Romero), Canada
84. StopTheInstitute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 85. United for Mining Justice, Canada
86. United Steelworkers, Canada
87. WES Global Connections
88. Washington Ethical Society
89. World Dharma
90. Yasunidos Guapondelig, Ecuador

View the PDF of the letter

EVENT: National Security and the Criminalization of Dissent in Canada and Abroad

 

 

 

UPDATE: WATCH THE VIDEO OF THE TALK NOW

*******

Join us for our third panel:
“National Security and the Criminalization of Dissent
in Canada and Abroad”

When: Wednesday November 15, 2017 from 7:30 to 9:30PM

Where: 25OneCommunity, 251 Bank St, Ottawa, 2nd floor

What: Freddy Stoneypoint will talk about the use of national security discourse, laws and agencies to silence, discredit and criminalize Indigenous struggles for land, water, rights and sovereignty in Canada. Jen Moore will talk about the use of anti-terrorism and national security laws to quash dissent from Indigenous and environmental activists in Latin America, specifically around Canadian extraction projects. Both will speak of their personal experience with criminalization of dissent in Canada and in Peru. Last but not least, Paul Champ will talk about the failure of Canadian oversight mechanisms to protect environmental activists from national security agencies’ surveillance.

Our National Coordinator, Tim McSorley, will be moderating, and we will have a Q&A after each presentation. Le panel sera en anglais mais vous pourrez poser vos questions en français.

RSVP, share and invite your friends on Facebook

The event is PWYC and open to everyone. We will be collecting donations in support of ICLMG’s work. If you want to know why you should give to ICLMG, check out our long list of achievements and gains since our creation in 2002.

If you cannot attend, please consider supporting our work at patreon.com/iclmg or iclmg.ca/donate.

This panel is the third of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group’s National Security & Human Rights Speaker Series, sponsored by CUPE, the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

ICLMG will be hosting one panel per month for 5 months on an important and timely issue related to national security and human rights in Canada. Stay tuned for the next dates and topics.

Invite your friends and we hope to see you there. Thank you!


Who are our panelists?

Freddy Stoneypoint is an Ojibwe land defender and “ecoterrorist” from Sagamok Anishinawbek First Nation. Part of a land heist with the Bawating Water Protectors, Freddy helped organize the Reoccupation ceremony of Parliament Hill during #Canada150, where he was briefly detained with nine others. Later in August, he was arrested in a land intervention near an oil exploration site owned by Junex in so-called Quebec. Although the corporation itself was trespassing on the unceded ancestral lands of Mi’kma’ki, Freddy himself was arrested and placed into detention for four nights. Released on bail with several conditions and charges, he is currently studying Sociology and Indigenous Studies as a second-year undergraduate student at Carleton University.

Jen Moore is the Latin America Program Coordinator at MiningWatch Canada. She works with communities, organizations, and networks struggling with mining issues throughout Latin America. Prior to joining MiningWatch, she worked as a freelance print and broadcast journalist with strong interests in media democracy, collective rights and Canadian foreign policy in Latin America, principally collaborating with independent and alternative media.

Paul Champ is a litigation lawyer with a focus on human rights, employment, labour, and public interest law. Paul has developed a practice in national security law and has acted as counsel in several important constitutional law cases dealing with fundamental human rights, including the settlement for Benamar Benatta, rendered to the US by Canadian officials and emprisoned for 5 years without charges, the case of Abdelrazik v. Minister of Foreign Affairs, in which the court ruled that Canadian government officials violated a Canadian citizen’s Charter rights by arranging for his unlawful detention by Sudanese authorites and refusing to provide a passport, and the case of Canada v. Khadr (2008), which found that Canadian government officials violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by interrogating a Canadian youth detained by U.S. in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


The International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group is a national coalition of 45 Canadian civil society organizations that was established in the aftermath of the September, 2001 attacks in order to protect and promote civil liberties and human rights In the context of the so-called ‘war on terror’. Subscribe to our weekly News Digest, like our Facebook page, and follow us on Twitter @iclmg. Thanks!

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties.

You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

ICLMG’s Video Explainer: Breaking Down Bill C-59, The new National Security Act

Want to know what’s in Bill C-59, the new National Security Act, but don’t have time to read 150 pages of complicated legalese??
WE’VE GOT YOU COVERED!
Over the next few weeks, ICLMG will be releasing six videos on everything you need to know about Bill C-59. Let’s start with this intro video breaking down the bill into seven main sections, and digging into what’s good, bad and ugly.
Don’t hesitate to share it on Facebook & Twitter
And to subscribe to our channel to be notified when our next videos come out.
Thank you!

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties.

You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

Page 1 of 4612345...102030...Last »