Author Archives: ICLMG CSILC

LAST CHANCE – Tell the Senate: “Strengthen C-22 to ensure real national security oversight!”

1200px-Cansenate

UPDATE: Last Thursday, June 15, 2017, the members of the Senate committee on National Security and Defence rejected all amendments to Bill C-22. As it is, the bill will leave the future National Security Committee of Parliamentarians incapable of accomplishing its important oversight work. The Senate will vote on the bill in 3rd reading TOMORROW. This is our last chance to rectify this situation! Please send the letter below to all Senators TODAY even if you already participated in the previous actions. And share widely. Thank you!


Background information: On Monday, March 20th, 2017, the federal government passed amendments to Bill C-22, “An Act to establish the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians”, effectively cancelling several amendments proposed by the Public Safety House Committee – despite the fact that Liberal MPs make up the majority of the committee – and reverting the bill to its original, highly inadequate and worrisome text. On Tuesday, April 4th, the government voted in favor of Bill C-22 at third reading in the House of Commons. The bill was studied in the Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, and all further amendments that would have improved the bill have been defeated there as well. Read our analysis of Bill C-22. Read our latest brief on C-22 submitted to the Senate Committee.

As it is, the bill will leave the future National Security Committee of Parliamentarians incapable of accomplishing its important oversight work. Please take 2 minutes of your time and send a letter to all Senators urging them to strengthen C-22 TODAY as the Senate will vote on it for the last time tomorrow.

Copy and paste the email addresses of all Senators and feel free to use the following text and modify it as you see fit:

LETTER TO SENATORS

Dear Senators,

I am writing you today to ask that you take action to ensure strong parliamentary oversight of our country’s national security activities and policies.

I believe that Bill C-22, the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act, is an important and necessary piece of legislation. That is why I, and other Canadians, are so adamant that the bill be strengthened before becoming law.

As you are well aware, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Defence amended C-22 to answer concerns voiced by security experts and human rights advocates. These amendments, which had cross-party support, would have ensured committee members the ability to access the information necessary to investigate, enabled them to compel testimony and the production of documents, and generally allowed them to more effectively carry out their work.

Disappointingly, the majority of these amendments were removed before the bill passed third reading. I believe this was a mistake.

Furthermore, while the government has argued that it is important to pass the bill now, I believe it is worth taking more time in order to improve this important bill. During committee hearings, many experts proposed improvements that would have strengthened the bill, and that I believe should still be considered. Some of those were proposed as amendments at committee, but were voted down.

Therefore, I am asking you to work with your senate colleagues to ensure that the final version of Bill C-22 will:

– Allow the Committee access to all documents and information necessary for its members to accomplish their work;
– Restrict the ability of the Canadian government, including ministers and the Prime Minister’s Office, to block investigations – especially on broad grounds of national security;
– Grant the Committee of Parliamentarians the same power as parliamentary committees to compel people to appear and for documents to be provided – a solution here would be to transform the Committee of Parliamentarians into a Special Joint Parliamentary Committee;
– Allow the committee to seek judicial review of government decisions that would restrict the committee’s access to information, deny their ability to carry out specific investigations, or block sections of committee reports from being made public.

Thank you in advance for your work on this important issue.

Sincerely,

Continue reading

Fighting Hate in the Wake of the Quebec City Mosque Shooting: 5 Ways the Trudeau Government Can Act Now!

Solidarity chain against the Muslim and refugee bans at US Embassy in Ottawa on January 30, 2017 (Photo credit: Claude Panneton)

By Anne Dagenais Guertin and Tim McSorley – So much has happened in the last few days, we are struggling to keep up. The sheer volume of bad news can be overwhelming, so we are elated to see that people are taking to the streets, to their communities and to social media to show their solidarity against violence, racism, Islamophobia and injustice, with no sign of that outrage fading soon.

Our thoughts and solidarity are with the families of the victims and survivors of the shooting at the Centre culturel Islamique de Québec in Ste-Foy, and we firmly condemn all forms of violence and discrimination, especially Islamophobia and anti-Arab racism.

In the weeks and months leading up to this heinous crime, we have seen so many attacks on the rights and lives of numerous people and communities coming from so many sides, that they often feel chaotic, even unrelated. But as others have pointed out, and as we strongly believe, the events of January 29th cannot be seen in isolation from the overall political environment. They must be seen as linked, and denounced as such.

Continue reading

Minister Goodale: Reject Information Obtained Through Torture

The Honourable Ralph Goodale
Minister of Public Safety
269 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8

January 30, 2017

Dear Minister Goodale,

We are writing to you about the urgent need for Canada to revise the Ministerial Directives on torture issued by the previous government to conform to the unconditional ban on torture in international law.

Doing so now would send an important signal to Canadians and to the international community that Canada will under no circumstances use information from a foreign country that was likely obtained under torture, or share information that could likely lead to an individual being tortured.

Continue reading