20 years defending civil liberties

The Fight for the Return of Canadians Detained in Northeast Syria

Jack Letts’ mother, Sally Lane, and social justice advocate Matthew Behrens at the Supreme Court of Canada. Credit: Free Jack Letts

By Justin Mohammed

For the past four years, dozens of Canadian citizens – about half of whom are children – have been arbitrarily detained in Northeast Syria. Most have been living in squalid camps, in conditions that the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism has found to constitute torture, cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment. Their plight has, until very recently, gone under the radar of the Canadian public, media and political leaders. In stark contrast to others, such as Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor who have become household names due to the laudable efforts of the Government of Canada to bring them home from China, the Canadians detained in Northeast Syria have been stonewalled with a multitude of justifications about why Canada cannot repatriate them.

From the moment that the ICLMG became aware of this situation, it has steadfastly stood up for the human rights of these citizens. In 2019, a coalition of academics, civil society organizations, and lawyers were convened to discuss how this situation could be addressed, with the ICLMG playing an active role in those conversations. After a year of government advocacy, gathering information from the detainees’ relatives, and strategizing on ways to pressure the government into action, this coalition pushed the issue squarely into the public arena in January 2020, writing to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and demanding that he take action on behalf of these citizens. Human Rights Watch followed up with a landmark report on the Canadian detainees in June 2020, providing a springboard for the ICLMG and others to continue advocacy on these cases. In the first half of 2021, both the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee and the Subcommittee on International Human Rights held hearings on the topic, during which Amnesty International, Save the Children, Human Rights Watch and others testified about the pressing need for action.

The first breakthrough came in October 2020, when a five- year-old orphaned girl was finally repatriated to Canada, and since then the ICLMG has played a leading role in sustaining the pressure on the Government of Canada. It spoke out against the secretive consular policy created by Global Affairs Canada that established an entirely separate framework for Canadians detained in Northeast Syria, and in June 2022, the ICLMG hosted a webinar highlighting the parallels of the Canadian detainees’ situation with the unlawful detention carried out by the United States at Guantanamo Bay. Since then, a number of the Canadian detainees have been able to return but many remain trapped in Northeast Syria.

With limited action from the Canadian government, in December 2022, lawyers Lawrence Greenspon and Barbara Jackman took the case of the Canadian detainees to the Federal Court of Canada, seeking to force the government into action. Regrettably, the Government of Canada continues to deny that it has any legal responsibility towards this group of Canadians, despite holding the very keys that would put an end to the human rights violations they are suffering on a daily basis. This intransigence indicates that the lessons of commissions and reports of the past, such as the Arar Inquiry, the Iacobucci Inquiry, and the 2018 Auditor General’s report on consular services, have not yet been learned. The scandalous treatment of the Canadians
detained in Syria is sadly destined to be the next chapter in this shameful history.


Justin Mohammed is the former Program Manager (Campaigns & Advocacy) at Amnesty International Canada, and a former representative for Amnesty on the ICLMG steering committee.

Canada: Bring Them Home!

By Xan Dagenais

On January 20, 2023, Federal Court Justice Henry Brown ruled that Canada must repatriate Canadians illegally and arbitrarily detained in Northeast Syria in conditions United Nations officials have found to be akin to torture. Brown wrote that the government was in breach of section 6 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – guaranteeing all Canadians the right to enter, remain in, and exit Canada – and must act “as soon as reasonably possible” to bring Canadians home. Since then, the government has repatriated several Canadian women and children, but not all Canadians.

The Canadian government filed an appeal and, disappointingly, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned the lower court’s decision. The families of the Canadians left behind have recently asked the Supreme Court to reconsider its shocking decision not to hear their appeal and play its role as a guarantor of rights and justice, as the government is not doing so of its own accord.

The government continues to have no justification to refuse to repatriate all detained Canadians. It does not allege any of them engaged in or assisted in terrorist activities, and Justice Brown saw no evidence that any detainee had committed offenses contrary to Canadian law.

It remains crucial to send the government a strong message to act quickly. Every day the government fails to bring home these Canadians, it places their lives at risk from disease, malnutrition, violence, and ongoing armed conflicts, including bombing by Turkey’s military.

Please take action and share widely: iclmg.ca/repatriate-all-canadians


Xan Dagenais is the Communications and Research Coordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group

Back to table of contents

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

A Victory for Citizenship Equality!

By Tim McSorley

The ICLMG was among the first to denounce the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act (adopted in June 2014, formerly Bill C-24) as unconstitutional and anti-Canadian for discriminating against dual nationals by allowing the removal of citizenship for national security reasons. This law effectively created a two-tiered citizenship regime that discriminated against dual nationals, whether born abroad or in Canada, and naturalized citizens. These Canadians had more limited citizenship rights compared to other Canadians, simply because they or their parents or ancestors were born in another country. ICLMG supported a legal challenge against the law, writing:

The ICLMG opposed Bill C-24 since it was tabled in Parliament. The Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act is a step backward for our democracy and rule of law principle. With this new Citizenship Act, Canadians are divided into two classes: those who will keep their Canadian citizenship no matter what and those who can be stripped of their Canadian citizenship if some federal bureaucrats decide so. Thus, if you are born in Canada but you have parents or ancestors from another country, your Canadian citizenship is worth less. It can be revoked not by the court but by the government and this is unacceptable by any democratic standards.[1]

An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act (formerly Bill C-6) was adopted in June 2017 and removed the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security, effectively killing that two-tier citizenship regime.[2]


Tim McSorley is the National Coordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group

Footnotes

[1] ICLMG, “Press release: ICLMG joins other rights groups to denounce the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act as discriminatory and anti-Canadian,” ICLMG, August 20, 2015.

[2] For more information on the fight against citizenship revocation, see: Macklin, Audrey. “A Brief History of the Brief History of Citizenship Revocation in Canada,” in « Canadian Terror: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives on the Toronto 18 Terrorism Trials », Manitoba Law Journal, vol. 44, no 1 (2021), pp. 425-455.

Back to table of contents

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. Here at ICLMG, we are working very hard to protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in the context of the so-called “war on terror” in Canada. We do not receive any financial support from any federal, provincial or municipal governments or political parties. You can become our patron on Patreon and get rewards in exchange for your support. You can give as little as $1/month (that’s only $12/year!) and you can unsubscribe at any time. Any donations will go a long way to support our work.panel-54141172-image-6fa93d06d6081076-320-320You can also make a one-time donation or donate monthly via Paypal by clicking on the button below. On the fence about giving? Check out our Achievements and Gains since we were created in 2002. Thank you for your generosity!
make-a-donation-button

CSIS, Duty of Candour and Immunity for Illegal Activities

MP Salma Zahid (left), ICLMG’s National Coordinator Tim McSorley (centre left), and NCCM’s CEO Stephen Brown (centre right) and Senior Legal Counsel Karine Devost (right) at a press conference introducing Bill C-331. Credit: Jeffrey Jedras.

By Tim McSorley

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has a troubling history of skirting the law and engaging in unethical and even unlawful behavior in the course of its work, ranging from their complicity in the rendition, detention and torture of Canadians, harassing Muslims at school and in their workplace, surveilling environmental activists, or misleading the courts. Recently, there have been key revelations of ways that CSIS continues to engage in this troubling pattern.

Duty of candour and misleading the courts

In the past five years, multiple court rulings and reviews1Federal Court, Canadian Security Intelligence Services Act (CA) (Re), (2020 FC 616): https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/482466/index.do#_Toc45630178 [2020 FC 616]; Federal Court, In re motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order in Peshdary v AGC (2018), (2020 FC 137): https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/460406/index.do; NSIRA, Review arising from Federal Court’s Judgment in 2020 FC 616: https://nsira-ossnr.gc.ca/nsira-review-arising-from-federal-courts-judgment-in-2020. [NSIRA 2020] have found that CSIS has misled the courts and withheld important information from judges when applying for warrants, including that information used in support of these warrants was obtained illegally. This is known as breaching its “duty of candour” towards the courts – meaning CSIS has a duty to tell the truth to the courts, but didn’t. This is particularly important given that CSIS and government lawyers present information to the courts during hearings that are held in private. There is no one present to oppose the application, nor anyone apart from the judge to question the information being provided in support of these warrants – which is problematic in and of itself.

The most significant of these rulings was issued by Federal Court of Canada Justice Patrick Gleeson, in which the court reviewed multiple instances of CSIS breaching its duty of candour over several years. In an incredibly damning ruling, the Justice wrote, “The circumstances raise fundamental questions relating to respect for the rule of law, the oversight of security intelligence activities and the actions of individual decision-makers.”22020 FC 616 Following this ruling, and another from Justice O’Reilly revealing another breach just two months later, ICLMG wrote to the minister of Public Safety at the time, Bill Blair, demanding that he take immediate action to put an end to this abuse of power and hold the CSIS officers involved accountable.3Tim McSorley, “New revelations of spy agency’s unlawful activities and misleading courts shows need for concrete action and accountability,” ICLMG, September 2, 2020: https://iclmg.ca/new-revelations-of-csis-misleading-courts/ Alongside the letter, we launched an email action that resulted in more than 1,600 messages being sent to the Public Safety and Justice ministers.

Continue reading

Footnotes

Page 6 of 9« First...45678...Last »