Un document de travail par Craig Forcese, professeur associé, Université d’Ottawa, Section Common Law
Résumé: Two thousand and thirteen was the year of the spy. Edward Snowden – “leaker” or “whistleblower” depending on one’s perspective – ignited a mainstream (and social) media frenzy in mid-2013 by sharing details of classified US National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs with the U.K. Guardian and Washington Post newspapers. For related reasons, 2013 was also the year in which the expression “metadata” migrated from the lexicon of the technologically literate to the parlance of everyday commentary. The NSA revelations fuelled media, academic and other speculation about whether similar surveillance programs exist in Canada. That attention focused on Canada’s NSA equivalent (and close alliance partner), the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). CSEC does have a metadata collection program, prompting questions about its legal basis, and the extent to which CSEC is governed by robust accountability mechanisms. This article focuses on a single aspect of this debate: By reason of technological change and capacity, have the state’s surveillance activities now escaped governance by law? A broad question with a number of facets, this article examines the specific sub-issue of metadata and its relationship with conventional rules on searches and seizures. The article concludes that the privacy standards that CSEC must meet in relation to metadata are much more robust than the government seems to have accepted to date.
Lire plus
La Ligue des droits et libertés lance cette semaine le numéro de printemps 2014 de sa revue Droits et libertés. Dans un contexte où les révélations d’Edward Snowden ont suscité un débat public salutaire sur la mise en place d’un système de surveillance des populations, ce numéro vise à apporter un éclairage supplémentaire sur l’évolution des enjeux de surveillance et de protection de la vie privée et des renseignements personnels, leurs implications en matière de démocratie et de droits humains ainsi que les perspectives en termes de résistance et alternatives.